Skip to the content

Menu

Problem

CSG sought to identify deficiencies and inconsistencies in data collected over several years analyzing grant-awarded organization’s processes and outcomes. These grants and data were offered through the Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP) under its Electronic Absentee Systems for Elections (EASE) and Effective Absentee Systems for Elections (EASE 2) grants.

Process

FMG evaluated each EASE grant and categorized it according to its objectives, hypotheses, and data packages. For each grant, FMG assessed whether the data provided by the grantee is sufficient for an evaluation of the project to be conducted. For those grants that did not have all of the data necessary for an evaluation, FMG identified the deficiencies or inconsistencies that existed in the data and determined if these problems can be addressed with data from other sources. 

Impact

FMG provided a detailed report to CSG covering results of the assessments, and the report was then submitted to FVAP. The report categorized each grant by its broad objectives. Within each category, FMG identified (1) the grants that can be evaluated with the data provided by the grantee, (2) the grants that can be evaluated if additional data were collected or added to the existing data, and (3) the grants that cannot be evaluated, even if additional data were added.

Partner With FMG

Brian Griepentrog - Fors Marsh Group

Brian Griepentrog

Senior Vice President, Research

Get in Touch

Request a meeting. Ask a question. Send an RFP. Inquire about careers. The right person here will reply to your inquiry.

Impact

Submit your email. Receive FMG’s Impact, our monthly publication.

Please enter a valid Email address